ArticleJHLT open2026
Lung retransplantation during the Lung Allocation Score era: Outcomes from a large single center.
Article in JHLT open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lung retransplantation (ReTx) is the only definitive treatment for advanced chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). ReTx outcomes are historically inferior to those of primary transplant. Identification of clinically significant risk factors could guide candidate selection and resource allocation to optimize outcomes. Methods: We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study of all lung transplants performed at Columbia University Medical Center (CUMC) from 2005 to 2023. The primary outcomes of survival and freedom from CLAD after ReTx were analyzed using Cox regression models. Results: We identified 51 lung retransplant recipients and compared them with 1149 primary lung transplant recipients. ReTx accounted for 3.9% of all transplants, and almost all were for CLAD-BOS.One-, three-, five-, and ten-year survival after ReTx was 96%, 72%, 55%, and 28%, respectively (median = 5.61 [3.30-8.51] years). Characteristics associated with worse survival following ReTx included age ≥ 55 (adjusted HR 2.6; 95% CI, 1.39-5.02) and early-onset CLAD following ReTx (HR 4.86; 95% CI, 1.94-12.2). Pretransplant mechanical ventilation or ECMO support, type of surgical procedure, and the interval between primary and re-transplantation were not significantly associated with survival. Overall, our center's outcomes after lung ReTx were more favorable than those previously reported, likely due to more restrictive candidate selection. These findings highlight the importance of careful patient selection. Multicenter prospective studies are needed to further refine risk stratification and optimize ReTx outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.