Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41756143›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2026

Inguinal CTV contouring in anal cancer: comparative validation of inguinal lymph nodes contouring guidelines and implications for consensus.

Viola De Luca, Stefania Manfrida, Natalia Barogi, Flavia De Giacomo, Raffaella Michela Rinaldi, Bruno Fionda, Roberta Bertolini, Giuditta Chiloiro, Rosa Autorino, Gabriella Macchia and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Viola De LucaFondazione Policlinico Universitario 'A. Gemelli' IRCCS, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Italy.
Stefania ManfridaFondazione Policlinico Universitario 'A. Gemelli' IRCCS, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Italy.
Natalia BarogiFondazione Policlinico Universitario 'A. Gemelli' IRCCS, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Italy.
Flavia De GiacomoFondazione Policlinico Universitario 'A. Gemelli' IRCCS, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Italy.
Raffaella Michela RinaldiFondazione Policlinico Universitario 'A. Gemelli' IRCCS, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Italy.
Bruno FiondaFondazione Policlinico Universitario 'A. Gemelli' IRCCS, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Italy.
Roberta BertoliniFondazione Policlinico Universitario 'A. Gemelli' IRCCS, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Italy.
Giuditta ChiloiroFondazione Policlinico Universitario 'A. Gemelli' IRCCS, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Italy.
Rosa AutorinoFondazione Policlinico Universitario 'A. Gemelli' IRCCS, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Italy.
Gabriella MacchiaRadiation Oncology Unit, Responsible Research Hospital-Campobasso and Catholic University of Sacred Heart-Rome, Rome, Italy.
Nicola DinapoliFondazione Policlinico Universitario 'A. Gemelli' IRCCS, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Italy.
Christopher L HallemeierDepartment Of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Arizona, USA.
Allison E GardaDepartment Of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Arizona, USA.
Maria Antonietta GambacortaFondazione Policlinico Universitario 'A. Gemelli' IRCCS, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: Contouring Inguinal lymph nodes (ILNs) in anal squamous cell cancer (ASCC) remains challenging. Accurate delineation is essential to optimize treatment efficacy with sparing of organs at risk (OaRs). Garda et al. proposed a contouring guideline based on the anatomical distribution of inguinal lymphadenopathy. This study evaluates their effectiveness in ensuring adequate ILNs coverage. Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed ASCC patients with radiologically positive inguinal lymph nodes treated with IMRT in our institution between 2015 and 2024. ILNs were mapped relative to the femoral vessels and delineated based on the Garda's guidelines. Descriptive analyses were conducted. Results: Among 46 patients with positive ILNs, 27 (59%) had cT3-T4 stage and 27 (59%) had bilateral inguinal nodal involvement. Overall, 203 ILNs were analyzed: 88% (178 nodes) were anteromedial to the femoral vessels. Garda's CTV encompassed 182 nodes (90%), while 22 nodes (11%) across 14 patients (30%) were not covered. Most of the uncovered nodes were in the superolateral region (n = 15, 7% of all nodes), whereas 6 nodes (3%) from six patients were identified in the inferior region. Only one node was found in the superomedial quadrant, while no nodes were located posteriorly. Conclusions: These findings validate the proposed guidelines, confirming their effectiveness in reducing unnecessary irradiation of the posterolateral quadrant. However, coverage gaps highlight the need for further refinements to optimize target delineation. These findings offer disease-specific evidence to inform the harmonization of inguinal CTV delineation and support the development of standardized, consensus-based contouring protocols.

Identifiers

PMID41756143
PMCPMC12933745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.