Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41756112›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2026

Echocardiographic strain imaging and progression of atrial fibrillation in low-risk individuals.

Amelie H Ohlrogge, Ferdinand Seum, Nick L van Vreeswijk, Dora Csengeri, Christoph Sinning, Dominik Linz, Michiel Rienstra, Renate B Schnabel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Amelie H OhlroggeDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Germany.
Ferdinand SeumDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Germany.
Nick L van VreeswijkDepartment of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Dora CsengeriDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Germany.
Christoph SinningDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Germany.
Dominik LinzDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Michiel RienstraDepartment of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Renate B SchnabelDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Left atrial (LA) and left ventricular (LV) strain are sensitive parameters characterizing left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and atrial remodeling. We aimed to assess the association of LA and LV strain and clinical AF progression in two pooled European prospective clinical cohorts. Methods: Individuals were examined at baseline, with LV global longitudinal strain (GLS), LA reservoir strain (LASr), LA conduit strain (LAScd) and LA contraction strain (LASct) measured by speckle-tracking analysis in transthoracic echocardiography. AF progression was defined as a change from paroxysmal to persistent or persistent to permanent AF. Binary logistic regression was performed to assess the association of baseline strain parameters with AF progression. Results: Of 316 individuals, 29 (9.2%) had AF progression over a median follow-up of 12 months. Restricted cubic spline modelling suggested non-linear associations between GLS and LASr with AF progression. For LASr only the unadjusted spline model reached statistical significance (p = 0.0498), whereas the adjusted spline model did not (p = 0.074). For GLS, the spline fit indicated a U-shaped curve with a slight trend towards non-linearity (p = 0.072 unadjusted; p = 0.13 adjusted). In unadjusted logistic regression, LASr was significantly associated with AF progression (odds ratio (OR) per standard deviation 0.65, 95% CI 0.42-0.99; p = 0.047). Conclusions: Our data suggest a potential non-linear association for GLS and LASr as a marker of diastolic function with higher predicted probability of AF progression at lower strain values. However, the test for non-linearity did not reach statistical significance after adjustment.

Indexed as

Atrial fibrillationLeft AtriumLeft VentricleProgressionStrain

Identifiers

PMID41756112
PMCPMC12933449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.