ArticlePNAS nexus2026
The public health impact of private fitness expansion.
Article in PNAS nexus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The public health, medical, and scientific research communities call for cost-effective interventions that expand access to physical activity infrastructure and services to promote urban health. This study evaluates the public health impact of the private sector expansion of fitness infrastructure in Singapore. Leveraging the phased introduction of a chain of on-demand gym facilities across residential subzones between 2020 and 2022, we find that increased access to on-demand gym facilities is associated with a decrease in monthly doctor visits per capita and overall healthcare costs. We further provide community-level evidence to support a plausible pathway where access to these gym facilities prompts residents to engage in physical activity, ultimately reducing healthcare utilization. First, increased access to on-demand gym facilities is associated with higher use of public exercise amenities, as reflected by increased parking lot utilization near public fitness facilities. This pattern suggests that overall physical activity at the community level rises following the introduction of on-demand gyms. Second, the public health impact of access to on-demand gym facilities is greater in subzones with greater access to green spaces and community fitness venues, suggesting a positive synergy between private and public fitness infrastructure. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that private-sector investments in improving physical activity opportunities can produce public health benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.