Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41756085›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

An evaluation of U.S. federal investments in newborn screening: successes, gaps, and future directions.

Melissa Raspa, Rebecca Wright, Sara M Andrews, Suzanne Dolina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Melissa RaspaRTI International, Center for Genomics and Applied Public Health, Durham, NC, United States.
Rebecca WrightRTI International, Center for Genomics and Applied Public Health, Durham, NC, United States.
Sara M AndrewsRTI International, Center for Genomics and Applied Public Health, Durham, NC, United States.
Suzanne DolinaRTI International, Center for Genomics and Applied Public Health, Durham, NC, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Newborn screening (NBS) is a successful public health program conducted by states that provides screening, confirmatory testing, and access to treatments for millions of babies each year. Federal legislation has outlined activities to support the newborn screening system. This paper summarizes an evaluation of investments made by the Health Resources and Services Administration's (HRSA) within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services in the newborn screening system. Methods: A total of 52 participants took part in either an interview or focus group. Participants represented a variety of NBS groups, including federal program grantees, state public health departments, healthcare providers, parents and patient advocacy representatives, newborn screening researchers, and subject matter experts. Data collection sessions were recorded and transcribed. A rapid turnaround analysis approach was used to code the qualitative data. Results: Participants provided feedback on the progress made by the newborn screening system as a result of HRSA's investments. Although there have been a number of successes, gaps remain. Additional support is needed in the areas of education, training, and technical assistance to enhance and expand screening capacity, conduct short- and long-term follow-up, and improve health equity and outcomes. Conclusion: Newborn screening has maintained a strong tradition as a successful public health program. Continued federal investments are needed to prepare the newborn screening system for systematic changes on the horizon.

Indexed as

Neonatal ScreeningFocus GroupsHumansInfant, NewbornProgram EvaluationUnited StatesUnited States Dept. of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Health Resources and Services Administrationgenetics educationhealth outcomesnewborn screeningprogram evaluationpublic health policy

Identifiers

PMID41756085
PMCPMC12932493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.