ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Current situation and influencing factors of scientific literacy in fitness of Chinese children and adolescents.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to develop and validate a scientific fitness literacy (SFL) assessment model for Chinese children and adolescents and to examine the associations between SFL and its key influencing factors within an integrated social-ecological and self-determination theory framework. Methods: Data were collected from 147,104 students (grades 4-12) across 31 provinces in mainland China using a multi-stage cluster random sampling design. SFL was assessed across four dimensions: knowledge, attitude, skills, and habits. The relative contributions of five influencing factors-lifestyle, individual socialization, family, school, and social environment-were analyzed using multiple regression models. Results: The overall SFL index was 65.8 (range 0-100), with knowledge (59.2) and skills (58.2) scoring below the passing threshold. Lifestyle ( Conclusion: The integrated framework provides a more comprehensive explanatory model for SFL than approaches that focus solely on internal factors. Interventions should prioritize lifestyle and socialization while placing greater emphasis on family and social environments rather than relying solely on school-based factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.