Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41756031›Full record

ArticleCanadian respiratory journal2026

Predictive Factors and Nomogram for Malignant Pulmonary Nodules (≤ 1 cm).

Zhenxin Cao, Ying Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian respiratory journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zhenxin CaoXingzhi College, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, 321004, China, zjnu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-7780-9938
Ying ZhuDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Jinhua Guangfu Hospital, Jinhua, 321000, China.ORCID 0009-0004-2739-369X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Models for predicting malignancy in pulmonary nodules ≤ 10 mm are lacking. This study aimed to identify predictive factors and develop a risk model for such nodules. Methods: A retrospective cohort study analyzed 298 patients with pulmonary nodules ≤ 1 cm. Variables including sex, smoking, nodule position, density, enhancement, diameter, and calcification were considered. A nomogram was developed using forward stepwise selection. Results: The nomogram, incorporating the seven aforementioned variables, achieved an area under the curve of 0.79. Multivariable analysis identified partial-solid/nonsolid density (vs. solid), larger diameter, and the absence of calcification as significant independent predictors of malignancy. At its optimal threshold, the nomogram showed 70% sensitivity, 79% specificity, and 77% accuracy. Decision curve analysis indicated a net benefit. Conclusions: Nodule density, diameter, and calcification status are key independent predictors of malignancy in nodules ≤ 1 cm. The developed nomogram, which also includes other clinical and computed tomography features, shows good predictive performance but requires external validation, especially considering its sensitivity.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsMultiple Pulmonary NodulesNomogramsSolitary Pulmonary NoduleAgedCalcinosisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, X-Ray Computeddecision curve analysisearly diagnosislung cancernomogrampredictive modelpulmonary nodulesreceiver operating characteristic

Identifiers

PMID41756031
PMCPMC12933631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.