ArticleCanadian respiratory journal2026
Predictive Factors and Nomogram for Malignant Pulmonary Nodules (≤ 1 cm).
Article in Canadian respiratory journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predictive Factors and Nomogram for Malignant Pulmonary Nodules (≤ 1 cm).Canadian respiratory journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Models for predicting malignancy in pulmonary nodules ≤ 10 mm are lacking. This study aimed to identify predictive factors and develop a risk model for such nodules. Methods: A retrospective cohort study analyzed 298 patients with pulmonary nodules ≤ 1 cm. Variables including sex, smoking, nodule position, density, enhancement, diameter, and calcification were considered. A nomogram was developed using forward stepwise selection. Results: The nomogram, incorporating the seven aforementioned variables, achieved an area under the curve of 0.79. Multivariable analysis identified partial-solid/nonsolid density (vs. solid), larger diameter, and the absence of calcification as significant independent predictors of malignancy. At its optimal threshold, the nomogram showed 70% sensitivity, 79% specificity, and 77% accuracy. Decision curve analysis indicated a net benefit. Conclusions: Nodule density, diameter, and calcification status are key independent predictors of malignancy in nodules ≤ 1 cm. The developed nomogram, which also includes other clinical and computed tomography features, shows good predictive performance but requires external validation, especially considering its sensitivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.