Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41756008›Full record

ArticleIntegrative organismal biology (Oxford, England)2026

Myliobatid Ray Gliding Dynamics: Experimental Tests of Body Shape and Tail Length on Stability.

S B Cooper, C F White, G V Lauder, J Chaumel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

S B CooperMuseum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
C F WhiteMuseum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8260-290X
G V LauderMuseum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0731-286X
J ChaumelMuseum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3495-3996

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myliobatid stingrays (eagle, cownose, and manta rays) swim using oscillatory locomotion, flapping their pectoral fins for propulsion while relying on their elongated tails for stability. During swimming, myliobatids often exhibit gliding behavior, a passive locomotion mode when active flapping ceases and the pectoral fins are maintained in a static position. We hypothesized that different pectoral fin conformations influence body stability and that the tail plays a critical role in stabilizing the models during gliding. To test this, we designed and 3D-printed four myliobatid-inspired models with different pectoral fin conformations: three with increasing dihedral angles and one model with an anhedral configuration. Each model was tested with three tail lengths: twice the disc width, equal to disc width, and no tail. Models were tested in a flow tank at increasing flow velocities. Stability, determined by pitch, roll, sway, and ODBA (overall dynamic body acceleration), was measured using high speed video and an accelerometer embedded into each model. When the models were compared without tails, the position of the pectoral fins also affected stability. Among models with dihedral angles, stability decreased with increasing dihedral angle. The model with an anhedral conformation was the most unstable. However, all models significantly reduced pitch, roll, sway, and ODBA with the presence of the tail, indicating that the tail had a stabilizing effect in all models regardless of the pectoral fin conformation. These findings indicate that pectoral fin conformation has a substantial effect on body stability and, in combination with the tail, enables stable passive gliding. Understanding the effect of body and pectoral fin posture on stability during locomotion is important for future efforts to analyze the energetic cost of locomotion and to understand the principles of efficient underwater movement.

Identifiers

PMID41756008
PMCPMC12934353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.