ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Endovascular reperfusion followed by delayed open aortic repair in stable acute type A aortic dissection with malperfusion syndrome: a single-center experience.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Predictors of Recurrence Following Bronchial Artery Embolisation (BAE) for Haemoptysis: A Systematic Review and Evidence Synthesis Analyses Using SWiM Guidelines.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Pooled it
- Predictors of Recurrence Following Bronchial Artery Embolisation (BAE) for Haemoptysis: A Systematic Review and Evidence Synthesis Analyses Using SWiM Guidelines.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: We aimed to evaluate the outcomes of endovascular reperfusion followed by delayed open aortic repair in patients with acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) and malperfusion syndrome (MPS), as well as risk factors for mortality associated with organ failure. Methods: We retrospectively selected 777 patients with ATAAD admitted to our center. Patients with MPS ( Results: Overall hospital mortality was 37.2% in patients with ATAAD and MPS, significantly higher than in those without MPS (8.2%). However, patients with MPS who successfully underwent delayed repair after stenting had hospital mortality rates comparable to non-MPS patients (11.7% vs. 8.2%; Conclusion: Endovascular stenting followed by delayed open aortic repair in stable patients with ATAAD and MPS had favorable short-term outcomes. Stenting of the aorta and/or aortic branches is a relatively simple, minimally invasive intervention with short-term patency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.