Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41755978›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Intragastric Balloon-Induced Pancreatitis in a 21-Year-Old Male: A Case-Based Review.

Yousif Alabboudi, Mallika Mehrotra

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yousif AlabboudiGeneral Surgery, Rashid Hospital, Dubai, ARE.
Mallika MehrotraMedicine, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dubai, ARE.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intragastric balloon (IGB) placement is a temporary, minimally invasive weight loss intervention that is generally well tolerated; however, it may be associated with complications. While most adverse effects are mild, acute pancreatitis is a rare but potentially serious complication, most commonly attributed to extrinsic pancreatic compression. We report a case of acute pancreatitis developing eight weeks after IGB insertion in a 21-year-old male. The patient presented with severe epigastric pain radiating to the back and repeated vomiting following binge eating. Laboratory testing revealed markedly elevated serum lipase at 3,217 U/L (reference <60 U/L) and elevated CRP at 10.7 mg/L, with normal liver function tests, calcium, and triglyceride levels. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography demonstrated diffuse pancreatic enlargement with peripancreatic fat stranding, consistent with acute interstitial edematous pancreatitis. The Bedside Index of Severity in Acute Pancreatitis score was 0. With gallstones, alcohol use, and metabolic causes excluded, pancreatitis was attributed to extrinsic pancreatic compression from the IGB, precipitated by gastric distention. The patient improved with conservative management and was discharged after one week. Acute pancreatitis is a rare but serious complication of IGB placement. This case emphasizes the need for clinicians to maintain a high index of suspicion in patients presenting with epigastric pain after the procedure, particularly following dietary indiscretion.

Indexed as

gastric complicationsigb complicationigb-induced pancreatitisintragastric balloon (igb)recurrent acute pancreatitis

Identifiers

PMID41755978
PMCPMC12932084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.