ArticleCureus2026
The Washington Group Short Set of Functioning as a Global Disability Data Collection Tool: A Discussion on Its Comparability With a Local Disability Index From Japan.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Disability is a global public health issue. To tackle the issue, internationally comparable disability data collection tools are needed. Against the backdrop of the global demand, the Washington Group Short Set on Functioning (WG-SS) has been developed and adapted globally. It is reasonable, from a global perspective, to use the internationally standardized tool to capture the current situation across the world. However, use of the tool may not necessarily be reasonable from a local perspective. In Japan, traditionally, persons with a legal disability certificate or an intractable disease are recognized as persons with disabilities. Previous studies based on secondary analyses of a national representative data set from Japan, however, suggested that a significant portion of them were not captured by the WG-SS; the percentages of persons being captured by the WG-SS among persons with a legal disability certificate and intractable disease were approximately 45% and 40%, respectively. Disability statistics based on the WG-SS may not fully reflect the whole picture of individuals with a legal disability certificate and intractable diseases in Japan. Therefore, utilization of the disability data for policy- making on Japanese local disability issues would need to be done with careful considerations over the limitations. These kinds of considerations may also be needed among not only Japanese stakeholders but also those in other countries where similar potential disparities exist between the WG-SS and the local disability index. A better understanding of the comparability between the WG-SS and the local disability index is essential for effective utilization of the WG-SS from a local perspective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.