ReviewCureus2026
A Narrative Review of Evolving Techniques in Nonsurgical Rhinoplasty: Risk Profile and Clinical Outcomes of Fillers.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nonsurgical rhinoplasty (NSR) is a minimally invasive alternative to surgical rhinoplasty that uses dermal fillers to enhance nasal aesthetics. When performed by trained injectors, NSR offers rapid correction with relatively low downtime. This narrative review explores the historical evolution, anatomical considerations, filler materials, patient selection, procedural techniques, risk mitigation strategies, and clinical outcomes associated with NSR. Hyaluronic acid (HA)-based fillers remain the gold standard due to their reversibility, biocompatibility, and favorable safety profile. Recent innovations, including ultrasound-guided injections, hybrid techniques combining HA with polydioxanone (PDO) threads, and AI-assisted facial mapping, have improved precision and patient satisfaction. Although most complications are transient, such as edema and erythema, rare but severe events like vascular occlusion, skin necrosis, and visual loss underline the importance of detailed anatomical knowledge and preventive techniques. The review also emphasizes individualized treatment approaches considering ethnic and anatomical variations. Overall, NSR demonstrates high efficacy, rapid recovery, and reversibility, with satisfaction rates exceeding 90% across multiple studies, reaffirming its position as a valuable aesthetic procedure when performed by trained professionals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.