SynthesisOccupational therapy international2026
Exploring Occupation-Based Interventions for Sleep Within OTPF: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Occupational therapy international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Exploring Occupation-Based Interventions for Sleep Within OTPF: A Systematic Review.Occupational therapy international · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Sleep is a critical occupation that affects health and daily functioning, yet occupation-based approaches to addressing sleep have not been clearly defined within occupational therapy. To clarify current practice, this systematic review examined existing literature and classified occupation-based interventions (OBIs) for sleep according to the Occupational Therapy Practice Framework (OTPF). Methods: Searches were conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and CINAHL for articles published from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2023, with an updated search performed up to October 27, 2024. Studies were included if they examined OBIs for sleep delivered by occupational therapists, incorporated occupation-based approaches or theoretical frameworks, and reported outcomes related to sleep quality, sleep participation, or occupational performance. Studies of any design were considered, while review articles, dissertations, conference proceedings, and non-English or inaccessible publications were excluded. Results were synthesized by classifying OBIs for sleep according to the OTPF. Results: A total of 7510 studies were identified. After removing duplicates, 6729 studies were screened by title and abstract, and 99 articles underwent full-text review. Ten studies met all inclusion criteria. The included studies involved diverse populations, regardless of the presence or absence of sleep-related problems. OTPF-based classification showed that most interventions primarily focused on sleep preparation, suggesting that current occupational therapy approaches may not fully address broader sleep-related needs. A multidisciplinary approach may therefore be necessary to address the complexity of sleep problems. Conclusion: These findings highlight the value of OBIs as theoretically grounded and clinically relevant strategies, while underscoring the need for further development of interventions that integrate both sleep preparation and participation. However, evidence was limited by heterogeneous outcome measures, which precluded meta-analysis, and by the exclusive focus on occupational therapy interventions, which may not fully reflect the multidisciplinary approaches to sleep.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.