ReviewJACS Au2026
The Impact of Continuous Flow Technology and Collaboration between Academia and Industry.
Review in JACS Au, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bioengineered Silver Nanoparticles: Next-Generation Biogenic Synthesis Strategies for Precision Biomedical Applications.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Insights into Flow and Continuous Systems in Pharmaceutical Manufacturing: Challenges and Opportunities.Organic process research & development · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Collaboration between researchers is one of the main drivers enabling new discoveries and improved chemical processes. This is especially true in the field of continuous flow technology where synthetic chemists, chemical engineers and data scientists contribute their expertise. This perspective article discusses the impact of such collaborations between academia and industry by highlighting key case studies from the last few years to showcase the continuing need and value of such efforts and provide valuable reference material.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.