Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41755767›Full record

ReviewBiomolecules & therapeutics2026

Hemostasis-Sparing Antiplatelet Therapy: Current Concepts and Emerging Targets in Arterial Thrombosis.

Ji Won Park, Eun Bee Oh, Tong-Shin Chang

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomolecules & therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ji Won ParkCollege of Pharmacy, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea.
Eun Bee OhCollege of Pharmacy, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea.
Tong-Shin ChangCollege of Pharmacy, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arterial thrombosis remains a leading cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality despite widespread use of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitors. Although these agents reduce ischemic events, their efficacy is counterbalanced by dose-dependent bleeding and their inability to distinguish pathological platelet activation from physiological hemostasis. Recent advances in platelet biology have shifted therapeutic development toward hemostasis-sparing antiplatelet strategies- approaches designed to selectively inhibit thrombosis while preserving baseline hemostatic function. These strategies target upstream adhesion receptors (GPVI, GPIb-vWF, CLEC-2) and receptor-proximal intracellular signaling nodes (SYK, BTK, PI3Kβ, PLCγ2, NADPH oxidases) that are preferentially engaged under high-shear or strongly prothrombotic conditions. Early-phase clinical and translational studies of such agents demonstrate antithrombotic efficacy with minimal impact on bleeding time, supporting their mechanistic selectivity. In parallel, contemporary clinical practice increasingly utilizes individualized risk assessment, platelet function testing, and genetic profiling to tailor treatment intensity. This integration of mechanism-selective agents with patient-specific risk evaluation forms the basis of precision-based thrombosis prevention, a framework aimed at aligning the duration and depth of platelet inhibition with the dynamic balance between ischemic and bleeding risk. Together, these developments mark a paradigm shift from broad platelet suppression toward rational, context-adaptive, and safer antiplatelet therapy.

Indexed as

Adhesion receptorsArterial thrombosisHemostasis-sparing therapyIntracellular kinasesPlatelet activationPrecision antithrombotic strategy

Identifiers

PMID41755767
PMCPMC12961990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.