ArticleBJPsych open2026
Self-harm in children involved in private and public family justice court proceedings: longitudinal national data linkage study.
Article in BJPsych open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLittle is known about self-harm in children involved in family justice proceedings, particularly in private family courts in England and Wales.
aimsTo examine records of self-harm in children involved in private and public law proceedings using population-level linked data.
methodA retrospective e-cohort study of children aged under 18 years, using linked health and family justice (Cafcass Cymru) data (2011-2018). Family court involvement was recorded from age 0 to 17 years. Incidence of self-harm was recorded from age 10 to 17 years to fit with the standard definition of self-harm. Annual incidence of self-harm over time across general practitioner (GP), emergency department and hospital admissions for individual children in private and public law proceedings were compared with a non-court cohort using Poisson regression. Self-harm following court proceedings was compared with an age- and gender-matched non-court cohort using Cox regression.
resultsAdjusted self-harm rates were higher in court-involved children than the non-court cohort (incident rate ratios (IRRs) (95% CI), private: GP 1.8 (1.6-2.1); emergency department 1.4 (1.2-1.7); admissions 1.8 (1.5-2.1); public: GP 4.6 (4.1-5.3); emergency department 5.0 (4.3-5.8); admissions 5.0 (4.3-5.8)). Compared with matched comparison children, risk of self-harm was higher following private (adjusted hazard ratios 2.0 (1.7-2.2)) and public court proceedings (hazard ratio 2.3 (2.7-3.8)). Hazard ratios were greater for those from less deprived areas and those with no history of self-harm.
conclusionsThe elevated risk of self-harm in children involved in public law proceedings is well recognised. Our study highlights risk in children in private family justice proceedings. Elevated risk among those from less deprived areas and those with no history of self-harm may reflect circumstances associated with family justice involvement, resulting in rates comparable to children with other pre-existing vulnerabilities. Contact with family justice is an opportunity to offer preventative support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.