ArticlePrimary health care research & development2026
Health extension programme unit for optimizing access to quality healthcare service in Ethiopia: a case study.
Article in Primary health care research & development, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEthiopia has been working to achieve universal health coverage through optimizing the Health Extension Programme (HEP). The HEP optimization aspires to increase health service access, quality, and equity through different strategies, including establishing HEP units in health centres and primary hospitals. Therefore, understanding the processes of the HEP unit and its implementation experience is crucial for scale-up and sustainability.
aimThis paper aims to document and share the lessons learned from implementing the HEP unit.
methodThis research collected qualitative data from 14 districts/woredas in 2023. Forty-three in-depth interviews (IDIs) and four focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted. Audio-recorded data were transcribed verbatim and translated. A thematic analysis approach was used to analyze the data, and direct quotations were used to present the findings.
resultIn the Improve Primary Health Care Service Delivery (IPHCSD) project implementation sites, all 64 health centres, and primary hospitals established HEP units. Setting up the unit improved healthcare provision by promoting collaboration and teamwork, enhancing their skills, coordination, technical support to the catchment health post and increased access to healthcare services through outreach delivery. However, challenges such as a shortage of human resources, dedicated offices for the unit coordinators and team members, inadequate stakeholders' engagement in the establishment processes, and insufficient tools and supplies were identified.
conclusionThe HEP unit has improved community-level health services, enhanced health professionals' skills and teamwork, and technical support to catchment health posts. Strengthening community engagement, advocacy, mentorship, training, and ensuring sufficient staffing, infrastructure, and supplies are essential for the programme's scale-up and sustainability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.