ArticleActas espanolas de psiquiatria2026
Exploring the Effect of Genetic Testing on Personalised Treatment Plans for Depression.
Article in Actas espanolas de psiquiatria, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAs a result of individual genetic variations, some patients show no response to initial antidepressant medications. This study aims to investigate the association between specific genetic polymorphisms and the efficacy of antidepressant drugs and to improve the accuracy and effectiveness of treatment under the guidance of genetic testing.
methodsA retrospective screening was conducted on medical records from, Suixian People's Hospital between January 2022 and December 2024. A total 202 patients with depression carrying the CYP2C19 gene were selected after the application of exclusion criteria. They were assigned to three groups in accordance with their genetic metabolism types: the rapid metabolism group (Group A, n = 65), the intermediate metabolism group (Group B, n = 94) and the poor metabolism group (Group C, n = 43). All three groups were treated with sertraline for a six-week treatment cycle. The observation indicators included scores on the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD); onset time of drug effect; rates of response and remission; scores on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scale; levels of the neurotransmitter factors 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF); incidence of adverse events; and scores on the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-8 (MMAS-8).
resultsThe baseline data of the three groups of patients were comparable before medication (p > 0.05). Compared with those in Groups A and B, patients in Group C showed a significantly greater reduction in HAMD scores (all p < 0.05), along with higher response rates (all p < 0.05) and remission rates (all p < 0.05). Amongst the three groups, Group C had a shorter onset time of drug effect (all p < 0.05); more significant improvement in CGI-I scores (all p < 0.05); and more prominent upregulation of neurotransmitter factors, namely, 5-HT (all p < 0.05), GABA (all p < 0.05) and BDNF (all p < 0.05). Regarding the incidence of adverse events, Group C had the highest rate, whereas Group A had the lowest (10.8% vs. 24.5% vs. 41.9%). Compared with other groups, Group B exhibited a more significant increase in MMAS-8 scores (all p < 0.05).
conclusionsMetabolic phenotype exerts substantial effects on the therapeutic outcome of sertraline in patients with depression carrying the CYP2C19 gene. Amongst groups, Group C showed better therapeutic efficacy but an elevated incidence of adverse events and lower medication adherence; Group A had relatively poor efficacy; and Group B demonstrated superior adherence. In clinical practice, individualised treatment can be implemented on the basis of CYP2C19 metabolic typing to improve therapeutic efficacy and reduce adverse events and medical burden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.