ArticleThoracic research and practice2026
Underutilization of Bacteriological Testing in Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis: A Retrospective Single-center Study from Mardin, Türkiye.
Article in Thoracic research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveExtrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) poses diagnostic challenges due to the low bacillus burden of the disease and the limited use of bacteriological tests. The aim of this study was to evaluate bacteriological confirmation rates, diagnostic methods, and sampling practices among patients diagnosed with tuberculosis (TB) in a southeastern province of Türkiye. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis retrospective study included a total of 456 TB cases diagnosed between 2014 and 2019. The cases were classified as pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB), EPTB, and cases with both types of involvement. Bacteriological and histopathological confirmation rates were compared between the groups.
results41.0% of all cases were classified as EPTB. The most commonly involved site was lymph node TB (22.4%). Bacteriological confirmation rates were significantly lower in EPTB cases: acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smear positivity was 3.2% and culture positivity was 4.3%, whereas the histopathological confirmation rate was 88.8%. No bacteriological samples were taken from 63.1% of patients in the EPTB group. Among PTB cases, AFB smear positivity (71.4%) and culture positivity (66.5%) were significantly higher (
conclusionThe findings suggest that bacteriological tests are both underused and of low diagnostic efficiency in EPTB cases. Most diagnoses are based on histopathology rather than on bacteriological confirmation. Strengthening sampling strategies and promoting the use of rapid molecular testing are critical for enhancing bacteriological validation in EPTB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.