ArticleTranscription2026
Genomic and structural insights into TATA-Binding protein from cestodes.
Article in Transcription, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The TATA-binding protein (TBP) is an essential component of the eukaryotic transcriptional machinery, yet little is known about the structure, evolution, and functional divergence of TBP paralogs in parasitic flatworms. Here, we performed a comprehensive comparative analysis of TBP1 and TBP2 across cestode species of medical and veterinary relevance. Using genomic annotation, multiple sequence alignment, homology modeling, phylogenetics, electrostatic potential mapping, and protein - DNA docking complemented with molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, we reveal that both paralogs maintain a highly conserved genomic organization and the canonical TBP α/β saddle architecture. TBP1 exhibits moderate variability in sequence and electrostatic in peripheral regions, whereas TBP2 is more conserved, suggesting distinct evolutionary constraints. Despite paralog divergence, all cestode TBPs retain the key aromatic and basic residues required for minor-groove recognition of the TATA box and interaction with general transcription factors. Docking and MD simulations confirm a conserved pattern of TATA-binding across species, with TBP2 displaying exceptionally uniform interaction networks. Together, these findings provide genomic and structural data for TBPs in cestodes, suggesting the existence of paralog-specific regulatory roles and offering new insights into transcriptional control in parasitic flatworms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.