ReviewJournal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons2026
To do or not to do extraction in temporomandibular joint pain: a systematic review background and rationale.
Review in Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The effect of dental extraction on temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain remains controversial in oral surgery practice and has important implications for treatment planning in patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). This systematic review evaluated whether third molar or other dental extractions are associated with changes in TMJ pain or TMD symptoms compared with non-extraction or pre-extraction controls. A protocol-registered review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Clinical Trials Registry-India were searched up to August 2025. Human studies enrolling patients with clinically diagnosed TMD and comparing extraction with non-extraction approaches were included. Primary outcomes were TMJ pain, function, and patient-reported quality of life. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2.0 and ROBINS-I/NOS, and random-effects meta-analysis with GRADE certainty assessment was performed when appropriate. Eight studies met inclusion criteria, of which six were included in quantitative synthesis. Dental extraction was associated with a significant reduction in TMJ pain or symptoms (pooled risk ratio/odds ratio=0.49; 95% confidence interval 0.31-0.66;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.