Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41755353›Full record

ArticleVascular specialist international2026

Endovascular Salvage After False Lumen Misdeployment of Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair or the Frozen Elephant Trunk in Aortic Dissection: A Case Report of Two Patients.

Marek Hudák, Martin Koščo, Mária Rašiová

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Vascular specialist international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marek HudákDepartment of Angiology, East Slovak Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Košice, Slovakia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0820-1328
Martin KoščoDepartment of Angiology, East Slovak Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Košice, Slovakia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8120-558X
Mária RašiováDepartment of Angiology, East Slovak Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Košice, Slovakia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1848-3875

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and the frozen elephant trunk (FET) are well-established treatment options for aortic dissection (AD). Inadvertent misdeployment of a TEVAR stent graft or FET into the false lumen (FL) can lead to serious complications. We report two cases of FL misdeployment. First, a 68-year-old female with acute Stanford type B AD underwent TEVAR; follow-up computed tomography angiography (CTA) revealed stent-graft misdeployment into the FL. Second, a 44-year-old female with Marfan syndrome, who had undergone supracoronary ascending aortic grafting for type A AD at 25 years of age, underwent urgent FET 19 years later for a symptomatic dissecting arch aneurysm; follow-up CTA confirmed misdeployment into the FL. In both cases, endovascular rescue was performed with fenestration of the intimal flap and additional stent-graft deployment to reroute flow into the true lumen. Misdeployment of TEVAR or FET into the FL is catastrophic but treatable with rapid diagnosis and timely intervention.

Indexed as

Aortic dissectionBlood vessel prosthesis implantationEndovascular proceduresFalse lumenStents

Identifiers

PMID41755353
PMCPMC12946644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.