ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Progress in Clinical Magnetocardiography: The Contactless Breakthrough for Noninvasive Clinical Detection of Cardiac Ischemia Now Needs Worldwide Standardization.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhancing Current-Source Imaging in Magnetocardiography: The Impact of Sensor Array Configuration.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Magnetocardiography has received regulatory recognition as a contactless, sensitive aid for physicians to diagnose or exclude myocardial ischemia in chest pain patients, with or without coronary obstruction. Such success, however, might not equate to guideline endorsement or proven clinical effectiveness. Moreover, despite its intrinsic advantages, including unrivalled contactless functional imaging of cardiac electrophysiology and a strong potential for multimodal integration with other imaging methods, its clinical adoption remains limited by the lack of internationally recognized standards and guidelines. This Perspective Review article, highlighting the viewpoints of clinical end users, is a call for urgent action to establish an interdisciplinary expert commission. This is essential for defining consensus-based standards and recommendations for the clinical use of MCG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.