ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Millimeter-Scale Magnetic Positioning Using a Single AMR Sensor and BP Neural Network.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Unlike conventional positioning systems that rely on multiple sensors, the positioning system proposed in this study uses a single anisotropic magnetoresistive (AMR) sensor to measure the magnetic field of a target permanent magnet. This approach significantly reduces the system hardware cost and complexity, facilitating the miniaturization of positioning systems. Leveraging a BP neural network model, which is shown to be fast and accurate, the positioning system obtains the real-time magnetic field of the target magnet using a single sensor, subsequently converting three-axis magnetic field data into coordinate information to achieve real-time tracking and localization. The results show that the root mean square errors (RMSEs) for the X and Z axes in the simulation are 0.27 mm and 0.26 mm, respectively, while the RMSEs for the X, Y, and Z axes in the actual test are 0.83 mm, 1.15 mm, and 0.85 mm, respectively. It is also observed that the positioning error correlates with variations in the magnetic field with respect to position, which originate from the strong distance-dependent nonlinearity of the magnetic field. This method not only reduces hardware costs but also maintains accuracy. It is particularly well-suited to applications requiring high-precision positioning and tracking, achieving millimeter-level accuracy within a volume of 50 × 40 × 40 mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.