Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41755270›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Automated Single-Sensor 3D Scanning and Modular Benchmark Objects for Human-Scale 3D Reconstruction.

Kartik Choudhary, Mats Isaksson, Gavin W Lambert, Tony Dicker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kartik ChoudharyDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Product Design Engineering, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4456-943X
Mats IsakssonDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Product Design Engineering, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3047-6811
Gavin W LambertIverson Health Innovation Research Institute, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0315-645X
Tony DickerFaculty of Health, Medicine and Behavioural Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8539-2960

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-fidelity 3D reconstruction of human-sized objects typically requires multi-sensor scanning systems that are expensive, complex, and rely on proprietary hardware configurations. Existing low-cost approaches often rely on handheld scanning, which is inherently unstructured and operator-dependent, leading to inconsistent coverage and variable reconstruction quality. This limitation necessitates the need for a controlled, repeatable, and affordable scanning method that can generate high-quality data without requiring multi-sensor hardware or external tracking markers. This study presents a marker-less scanning platform designed for human-scale reconstruction. The system consists of a single structured-light sensor mounted on a vertical linear actuator, synchronised with a motorised turntable that rotates the subject. This constrained kinematic setup ensures a repeatable cylindrical acquisition trajectory. To address the geometric ambiguity often found in vertical translational symmetry (i.e., where distinct elevation steps appear identical), the system employs a sensor-assisted initialisation strategy, where feedback from the rotary encoder and linear drive serves as constraints for the registration pipeline. The captured frames are reconstructed into a complete model through a two-step Iterative Closest Point (ICP) procedure that eliminates the vertical drift and model collapse (often referred to as "telescoping") common in unconstrained scanning. To evaluate system performance, a modular anthropometric benchmark object representing a human-sized target (1.6 m) was scanned. The reconstructed model was assessed in terms of surface coverage and volumetric fidelity relative to a CAD reference. The results demonstrate high sampling stability, achieving a mean surface density of 0.760points/mm2 on front-facing surfaces. Geometric deviation analysis revealed a mean signed error of -1.54 mm (σ= 2.27 mm), corresponding to a relative volumetric error of approximately 0.096% over the full vertical span. These findings confirm that a single-sensor system, when guided by precise kinematics, can mitigate the non-linear bending and drift artefacts of handheld acquisition, providing an accessible yet rigorously accurate alternative to industrial multi-sensor systems.

Indexed as

3D scanningautomationgeometric benchmarkinghuman body reconstructionpoint cloud registrationsingle-sensor system

Identifiers

PMID41755270
PMCPMC12944193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.