Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41755239›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

DCANet: Disentanglement and Category-Aware Aggregation for Medical Image Segmentation.

Xiaoqing Li, Hua Huo, Chen Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xiaoqing LiInformation Engineering College, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471000, China.
Hua HuoInformation Engineering College, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471000, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9545-5443
Chen ZhangInformation Engineering College, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471000, China.

Funding

Central Government Guiding Local Science and Technology Development Fund Program of Henan Province Z20221343032National Natural Science Foundation of China 61672210the Major Science and Technology Program of Henan Province 221100210500
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical image segmentation is essential for clinical decision-making, treatment planning, and disease monitoring. However, ambiguous boundaries and complex anatomical structures continue to pose challenges for accurate segmentation. To address these issues, we propose DCANet (Disentangled and Category-Aware Network), a novel framework that effectively integrates local and global feature representations while enhancing category-aware feature interactions. In DCANet, features from convolutional and Transformer layers are fused using the Feature Coupling Unit (FCU), which aligns and combines local and global information across multiple semantic levels. The Decoupled Feature Module (DFM) then separates high-level representations into multi-class foreground and background features, improving discriminability and mitigating boundary ambiguity. Finally, the Category-Aware Integration Aggregator (CAIA) guides multi-level feature fusion, emphasizes critical regions, and refines segmentation boundaries. Extensive experiments on four public datasets-Synapse, ACDC, GlaS, and MoNuSeg-demonstrate the superior performance of DCANet, achieving Dice scores of 84.80%, 94.07%, 94.60%, and 79.85%, respectively. These results confirm the effectiveness and generalizability of DCANet in accurately segmenting complex anatomical structures and resolving boundary ambiguities across diverse medical image segmentation tasks.

Indexed as

Diagnostic ImagingImage Processing, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsConvolutional Neural NetworksHumansboundary ambiguitydeep learningmedical image segmentationtransformer

Identifiers

PMID41755239
PMCPMC12944044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.