ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Optimizing OPM-MEG Sensor Layouts Using the Sequential Selection Algorithm with Simulated Sources and Individual Anatomy.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fetal Magnetocardiography Using Optically Pumped Magnetometers: A Literature Review.Biosensors · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Magnetoencephalography (MEG) based on optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs) offers the flexibility to position sensors closer to the scalp, which improves the signal-to-noise ratio compared to conventional superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) systems. However, the spatial resolution of OPM-MEG critically depends on sensor placement, especially when the number of sensors is limited. In this study, we present a methodology for optimizing OPM-MEG sensor layouts using each subject's anatomical information derived from individual magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We generated realistic forward models from reconstructed head surfaces and simulated magnetic fields produced by equivalent current dipoles (ECDs). We compared multiple simulation strategies, including ECDs randomly distributed across the cortical surface and ECDs constrained to regions of interest. For each simulated magnetic field map (MFM) database, we applied the sequential selection algorithm (SSA) to identify sensor positions that maximized information capture. Unlike previous approaches relying on large measurement databases, this simulation-driven strategy eliminates the need for extensive pre-existing recordings. We benchmarked the performance of the personalized layouts using OPM-MEG datasets of auditory evoked fields (AEFs) derived from real whole-head SQUID-MEG measurements. Our results show that simulation-based SSA optimization improves the coverage of cortical regions of interest, reduces the number of sensors required for accurate source reconstruction, and yields sensor configurations that perform comparably to layouts optimized using measured data. To evaluate the quality of estimated MFMs, we applied metrics such as the correlation coefficient (CC), root-mean-square error, and relative error. Our results show that the first 15 to 20 optimally selected sensors (CC > 0.95) capture most of the information contained in full-head MFMs. Additionally, we performed source localization for the highest auditory response (M100) by fitting equivalent current dipoles and found that localization errors were < 5 mm. The results further indicate that SSA performance is insensitive to individualized head geometry, supporting the feasibility of using representative anatomical models and highlighting the potential of this approach for clinical OPM-MEG applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.