Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41755231›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Optimizing OPM-MEG Sensor Layouts Using the Sequential Selection Algorithm with Simulated Sources and Individual Anatomy.

Urban Marhl, Rok Hren, Tilmann Sander, Vojko Jazbinšek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Urban MarhlInstitute of Mathematics, Physics and Mechanics, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0003-1562-8434
Rok HrenInstitute of Mathematics, Physics and Mechanics, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Tilmann SanderPhysikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, 10587 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2984-5579
Vojko JazbinšekInstitute of Mathematics, Physics and Mechanics, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-8592-6253

Funding

DAAD 57570963DFG 505063244The Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency program P2-0348, project N1-0283 and exchange program BI-DE/23-24-005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) based on optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs) offers the flexibility to position sensors closer to the scalp, which improves the signal-to-noise ratio compared to conventional superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) systems. However, the spatial resolution of OPM-MEG critically depends on sensor placement, especially when the number of sensors is limited. In this study, we present a methodology for optimizing OPM-MEG sensor layouts using each subject's anatomical information derived from individual magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We generated realistic forward models from reconstructed head surfaces and simulated magnetic fields produced by equivalent current dipoles (ECDs). We compared multiple simulation strategies, including ECDs randomly distributed across the cortical surface and ECDs constrained to regions of interest. For each simulated magnetic field map (MFM) database, we applied the sequential selection algorithm (SSA) to identify sensor positions that maximized information capture. Unlike previous approaches relying on large measurement databases, this simulation-driven strategy eliminates the need for extensive pre-existing recordings. We benchmarked the performance of the personalized layouts using OPM-MEG datasets of auditory evoked fields (AEFs) derived from real whole-head SQUID-MEG measurements. Our results show that simulation-based SSA optimization improves the coverage of cortical regions of interest, reduces the number of sensors required for accurate source reconstruction, and yields sensor configurations that perform comparably to layouts optimized using measured data. To evaluate the quality of estimated MFMs, we applied metrics such as the correlation coefficient (CC), root-mean-square error, and relative error. Our results show that the first 15 to 20 optimally selected sensors (CC > 0.95) capture most of the information contained in full-head MFMs. Additionally, we performed source localization for the highest auditory response (M100) by fitting equivalent current dipoles and found that localization errors were < 5 mm. The results further indicate that SSA performance is insensitive to individualized head geometry, supporting the feasibility of using representative anatomical models and highlighting the potential of this approach for clinical OPM-MEG applications.

Indexed as

auditory-evoked fieldsmagnetic field mapsmagnetoencephalographyoptically pumped magnetometerssensor optimizationsequential selection algorithm

Identifiers

PMID41755231
PMCPMC12944440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.