Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41755223›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

A Survey on Deep Learning Techniques for Fingerprint Presentation Attack Detection.

Hailin Li, Raghavendra Ramachandra

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hailin LiSAFE Center, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 2815 Gjøvik, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-1120-1508
Raghavendra RamachandraSAFE Center, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 2815 Gjøvik, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-0484-3956

Funding

The Research Council of Norway 321619
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The vulnerabilities of the fingerprint authentication system have raised security concerns in terms of adapting them in highly secured access control applications. Therefore, fingerprint presentation attack detection (FPAD) methods are essential to ensure reliable fingerprint authentication. Due to the lack of generalization of the traditional handcrafted-based approaches, deep learning-based FPAD has become mainstream and achieves remarkable performance in the past decade. In this paper, we will concentrate only on deep learning-based FPAD methods. We investigate recent methods and divide those into different categories to provide a comprehensive description. The benchmark metrics and publicly available datasets are also discussed. Lastly, we conclude the paper by discussing future perspectives to inspire further research.

Indexed as

biometricsdeep learningfingerprint presentation attack detection

Identifiers

PMID41755223
PMCPMC12943984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.