ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Development and Validation of Internet of Things-Enabled Weighing System for Cage-Free Poultry Houses.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate body-weight monitoring is essential for assessing welfare in cage-free poultry. However, commercial farms continue to rely on manual weighing because of concerns regarding the accuracy and reliability of automated methods. This study developed and evaluated an Internet of things (IoT)-enabled weighing platform integrating load cells, an microcontroller, a Raspberry Pi 5, and Node-RED for data acquisition, processing, and visualization. The system recorded weight measurements at 1 Hz, detected individual weighing sessions, and applied a rolling-median filter to produce stable weight estimates. Validation was performed against a reference scale during two weighing sessions one week apart using 75 cage-free hens randomly selected from a flock of 750 Hy-Line W80 birds. Bland-Altman analysis and a linear mixed-effects model indicated a small overestimation of approximately 6-9 g, with most measurements falling within the 95% limits of agreement, while overall mean absolute percentage error remained below 3%. Improved accuracy during the second session suggests that platform stability influenced performance. Overall, the system demonstrates strong potential for continuous low-stress weight monitoring in poultry farms. Future improvements should focus on refining calibration methods, enhancing mechanical stability, and integrating bird identification and presence-detection mechanisms to further support flock management and welfare monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.