Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41755214›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Federated Learning in Edge Computing: Vulnerabilities, Attacks, and Defenses-A Survey.

Sahar Alhawas, Murad A Rassam

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sahar AlhawasDepartment of Information Technology, College of Computer, Qassim University, Buraydah 52571, Saudi Arabia.
Murad A RassamDepartment of Information Technology, College of Computer, Qassim University, Buraydah 52571, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-3558-6737

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Federated Learning (FL), a distributed machine learning framework, enables collaborative model training across multiple devices without sharing raw data, thereby preserving privacy and reducing communication costs. When combined with Edge Computing (EC), FL brings computations closer to data sources, enabling low-latency, real-time decision-making in resource-constrained environments. However, this decentralization introduces several vulnerabilities, including data poisoning, backdoor attacks, inference leaks, and Byzantine behaviors, which are worsened by the heterogeneity of edge devices and their intermittent connectivity. This survey presents a comprehensive review of the intersection of FL and EC, focusing on vulnerabilities, attack vectors, and defense mechanisms. We analyze existing methods for robust aggregation, anomaly detection, differential privacy, and secure aggregation, with a focus on their feasibility within edge environments. Additionally, we identify open research challenges, such as scalability, resilience to heterogeneity, and energy-efficient defenses, and provide insights into the evolving landscape of FL in edge computing. This review aims to inform future research on enhancing the security, privacy, and efficiency of FL systems deployed in real-world edge environments.

Indexed as

adversarial attacksedge computingfederated learningprivacysecurityvulnerabilities

Identifiers

PMID41755214
PMCPMC12944444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.