Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41755209›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Probabilistic Bird Trajectory Forecasting with Heavy-Tailed Uncertainty Modeling for Low-Altitude Airspace Monitoring.

Feiyang Song, Zhonghe Liu, Yuyang Zhao, Jingguo Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Feiyang SongDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-2543-6118
Zhonghe LiuInstitute of Microelectronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China.
Yuyang ZhaoInstitute of Microelectronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China.
Jingguo ZhuInstitute of Microelectronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China.ORCID 0009-0007-3024-3635

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The low-altitude airspace of bird flocks is gradually shared by unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), posing safety risks that necessitate accurate trajectory forecasting. However, existing vision-based methods often treat trajectory prediction and UAV detection as separate tasks, assume light-tailed Gaussian noise, and rely on heavy backbones. These limitations, when applied to bird trajectory forecasting, limit uncertainty calibration and embedded deployment in ground-based monocular surveillance. In this work, we propose a unified framework for low-altitude monitoring. Its core, Mini-BirdFormer, combines a lightweight Transformer encoder with a Student-t mixture density head to model heavy-tailed flight dynamics and produce calibrated uncertainty. Experiments on a real-world dataset show the model achieves strong long-horizon performance with only 1.05 million parameters, attaining a minADE of 0.785 m and reducing negative log-likelihood from 1.25 to -2.01 (lower is better) compared with a Gaussian Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) baseline. Crucially, it enables low-latency inference on resource-constrained platforms at 616 FPS. Additionally, a system-level extension supports zero-shot UAV detection via open-vocabulary learning, attaining 92% recall without false alarms. Results demonstrate that combining heavy-tailed probabilistic modeling with a compact backbone provides a practical, deployable approach for monitoring shared airspace.

Indexed as

airspace monitoringbird trajectory forecastingedge computingheavy-tailed uncertaintyUAV safety

Identifiers

PMID41755209
PMCPMC12944390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.