Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41755195›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Influence of EEG Signal Augmentation Methods on Classification Accuracy of Motor Imagery Events.

Bartłomiej Sztyler, Aleksandra Królak, Paweł Strumiłło

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bartłomiej SztylerInstitute of Electronics, Lodz University of Technology, 90-924 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9370-8352
Aleksandra KrólakInstitute of Electronics, Lodz University of Technology, 90-924 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8850-6721
Paweł StrumiłłoInstitute of Electronics, Lodz University of Technology, 90-924 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2757-9828

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of various data-augmentation techniques on the performance of neural networks in EEG-based motor imagery three-class event classification. EEG data were obtained from a publicly available open-source database, and a subset of 25 patients was selected for analysis. The classification task focused on detecting two types of motor events: imagined movements of the left hand and imagined movements of the right hand. EEGNet, a convolutional neural network architecture optimized for EEG signal processing, was employed for classification. A comprehensive set of augmentation techniques was evaluated, including five time-domain transformations, three frequency-domain transformations, two spatial-domain transformations and two generative approaches. Each method was tested individually, as well as in selected two- and three-method cascade combinations. The augmentation strategies were tested using three data-splitting methodologies and applying four ratios of original-to-generated data: 1:0.25, 1:0.5, 1:0.75 and 1:1. Our results demonstrate that the augmentation strategies we used significantly influence classification accuracy, particularly when used in combination. These findings underscore the importance of selecting appropriate augmentation techniques to enhance generalization in EEG-based brain-computer interface applications.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyImaginationSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsBrain-Computer InterfacesClassification AlgorithmsConvolutional Neural NetworksHumansMovementCNNdata augmentationdeep learningEEG decodingmotor imagery

Identifiers

PMID41755195
PMCPMC12944423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.