ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Smartphone-Based Automated Photogrammetry for Reconstruction of Residual Limb Models in Prosthetic Design.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate modeling of residual limb geometry is essential for prosthetic socket design, yet current scanning techniques can be costly, operator-dependent, or impractical for repeated clinical use. This study presents a fully automated, low-cost photogrammetry workflow capable of generating metrically accurate 3D models of lower-limb residual limbs using video and still images acquired with a standard smartphone or a full-frame digital camera. The pipeline integrates adaptive frame selection, deep learning-based background removal, robust metric scaling via ArUco markers, and open-source Structure-from-Motion and Multi-View Stereo reconstruction, requiring no manual post-processing or proprietary software. Accuracy and repeatability were evaluated using four 3D-printed limb phantoms and high-resolution CT-derived meshes as ground truth. Smartphone video and full-frame camera acquisitions achieved sub-millimeter surface accuracy, volume and perimeter errors within ±1%, and high inter-session repeatability, all within clinically accepted thresholds for prosthetic socket fabrication. In contrast, smartphone still-photo reconstructions showed larger deviations and reduced stability. Acquisition time was under five minutes, and complete reconstruction required approximately 1 h and 30 min. These results demonstrate that smartphone video-based photogrammetry provides a practical, scalable, and clinically viable alternative for residual limb modeling, particularly in resource-constrained or remote care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.