ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Inferring Arm Movement Direction from EEG Signals Using Explainable Deep Learning.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Decoding reaching movements from non-invasive brain signals is a key challenge for the development of naturalistic brain-computer interfaces (BCIs). While this decoding problem has been addressed via traditional machine learning, the exploitation of deep learning is still limited. Here, we evaluate a convolutional neural network (CNN) for decoding movement direction during a delayed center-out reaching task from the EEG. Signals were collected from twenty healthy participants and analyzed using EEGNet to discriminate reaching endpoints in three scenarios: fine-direction (five endpoints), coarse-direction (three endpoints), and proximity (two endpoints) classifications. To interpret the decoding process, the CNN was coupled with explanation techniques, including DeepLIFT and occlusion tests, enabling a data-driven analysis of spatio-temporal EEG features. The proposed approach achieved accuracies well above chance, with accuracies of 0.45 (five endpoints), 0.64 (three endpoints) and 0.70 (two endpoints) on average across subjects. Explainability analyses revealed that directional information is predominantly encoded during movement preparation, particularly in parietal and parietal-occipital regions, consistent with known visuomotor planning mechanisms and with EEG analysis based on event-related spectral perturbations. These results demonstrate the feasibility and interpretability of CNN-based EEG decoding for reaching movements, providing insights relevant for both neuroscience and the prospective development of non-invasive BCIs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.