Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41755160›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Efficient Management of High-Frequency Sensor Data Streams Using a Read-Optimized Learned Index.

Hu Luo, Jiabao Wen, Desheng Chen, Zhengjian Li, Meng Xi, Jingyi He, Shuai Xiao, Jiachen Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hu LuoSchool of Electrical Automation and Information Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6192-8596
Jiabao WenSchool of Electrical Automation and Information Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China.
Desheng ChenSchool of Electrical Automation and Information Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China.
Zhengjian LiSchool of Electrical Automation and Information Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China.
Meng XiSchool of Electrical Automation and Information Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China.
Jingyi HeSchool of Electrical Automation and Information Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China.
Shuai XiaoSchool of Electrical Automation and Information Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4058-8120
Jiachen YangSchool of Electrical Automation and Information Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2558-552X

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2023M742608National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 62271345, 62306211, 62301356, 62403349Postdoctoral Fellowship Program of CPSF GZC20231919, GZC20252290
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid growth of sensor data in IoT and Digital Twins necessitates high-performance spatial indexing. Traditional indexes like Rtrees suffer from high storage overhead, while state-of-the-art learned indexes like GLIN encounter a "Refinement Bottleneck" due to coarse-grained Minimum Bounding Rectangle (MBR) filtering. Furthermore, existing solutions often trade update throughput for query accuracy, failing in dynamic IoT workloads with concurrent reads and writes. We propose DyGLIN (Dynamic Generate Learning-Based Index), a dynamic, read-optimized learned spatial index tailored for high-frequency sensor streams. DyGLIN introduces a decoupled leaf architecture separating query processing from data maintenance. To accelerate queries, we implement a hierarchical filtering pipeline using hierarchical MBRs (HMBR) and Cuckoo Filters to aggressively prune false positives. For maintenance, a Delta Buffer mechanism amortizes update costs, while logical deletion ensures high throughput. Experiments on real-world datasets show that DyGLIN reduces query latency by 26.4% [95% CI: 20.1%, 38.6%] compared to GLIN. It achieves 30.0% [95% CI: 21.4%, 35.9%] higher insertion throughput and superior deletion performance, with only an 18.5% [95% CI: 16.8%, 19.8%] increase in memory overhead.

Indexed as

IoTlearned indexsensor data streamsspatial indexingthroughput

Identifiers

PMID41755160
PMCPMC12944446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.