Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41755159›Full record

SynthesisSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Wearable Technology and Machine Learning for Prediction of Performance-Based and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: A Systematic Review.

Eloise Milbourn, Jiaqi Lai, Dale L Robinson, David C Ackland, Peter Vee Sin Lee

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eloise MilbournDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3052, Australia.ORCID 0009-0003-5028-3053
Jiaqi LaiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3052, Australia.
Dale L RobinsonSchool of Mechanical and Mining Engineering, University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia.
David C AcklandDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3052, Australia.
Peter Vee Sin LeeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3666-4872

Funding

Melbourne Research Scholarship from The University of Melbourne. Not applicable
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning models informed by patient-generated wearable data can be used to predict patient-reported and performance-based outcome measures. This approach offers a promising alternative to traditional outcome monitoring, which is commonly limited by recall bias, discrete sampling, and healthcare resource constraints. The aims of this systematic review were to identify wearable-derived features strongly associated with performance-based and patient-reported outcome measures, to compare the predictive performance across machine learning approaches, and to consolidate methodological limitations and provide suggestions for future work. Following a systematic search of four databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and IEEE Xplore), 18 eligible studies were identified, published between 2017 and 2024, spanning patients across eight disease categories. Most studies used wrist-worn devices measuring accelerometry, sometimes combined with heart rate, respiratory, or sleep metrics. Random forest and support vector machine models were the most common, while hidden Markov temporal models showed improved performance with access to longitudinal data. Predictive performance ranged from poor to excellent (AUC 0.56-0.92), and non-linear models generally outperformed linear models. Despite promising early results, most studies report similar limitations of small sample sizes, limited external validation, and difficulty achieving acceptable accuracy beyond binary predictions. Overall, these studies highlight the potential of wearable-informed machine learning for continuous and objective outcome assessment, but the consensus calls for further work to apply larger, more diverse longitudinal datasets and interpretable temporal modelling approaches to bridge the gap between the current proof-of-concept state and clinical translation.

Indexed as

Machine LearningPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresWearable Electronic DevicesAccelerometryDigital HealthHumansPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRandom Forestdigital biomarkersdigital healthfree-living monitoringmachine learningPBOMsPROMsremote patient monitoringwearable sensors

Identifiers

PMID41755159
PMCPMC12943912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.