ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Utilizing Data Quality Indices for Strategic Sensor Channel Selection to Enhance Performance of Hand Gesture Recognition Systems.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study proposes a data quality-driven channel selection methodology to improve hand gesture recognition performance in multi-channel wearable Human-Machine Interface (HMI) systems. The methodology centers around calculating (i) five data quality indices for both surface electromyography (sEMG) and pressure-based force myography (pFMG) signals and (ii) establishing a relationship between these data quality indices and the accuracy of gesture recognition for applications typified by prosthetic hand control. Machine learning (ML)-based and correlation-based methods were used to select three optimal channel/pair configurations from an eight-channel/pair system. Evaluations on the UOW and Ninapro DB2 datasets showed that the proposed methods consistently outperformed random channel selection, with the ML-based approach achieving the best results (76.36% for sEMG, 71.59% for pFMG, and 88.2% for fused sEMG-pFMG on the UOW dataset and 70.28% on Ninapro DB2). Notably, using three pairs of strategically selected sEMG-pFMG channels generated 88.2%, which is comparable to the 88.38% accuracy obtained with a full eight-channel sEMG system on the UOW dataset, highlighting the efficacy of our channel selection methodologies. These results highlight the value of data quality indices for sensor selection and provide a foundation for developing more efficient wearable HMI systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.