ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Energy-Biosensor Synergy: Intrinsic Catalytic Reactions as Label-Free Signal Pathways.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The versatile world of MXene nanohybrids: designed synthesis, functional diversity, and promising theranostics.Mikrochimica acta · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The selection of appropriate signal labels is a central consideration in electrochemical biosensing as it directly determines the achievable detection limits, dynamic range, and overall analytical performance. Conventional electroactive labels require low operating potentials, fast electron-transfer kinetics, and reliable attachment to electrode surfaces or recognition elements. Despite their extensive use, these labels present notable challenges for point-of-care applications, particularly in the detection of small molecules where target binding does not inherently generate a measurable electrochemical output. As a result, most sensing architectures depend on externally added redox reporters, introduced either freely into solution or covalently linked to recognition structures, which increases assay complexity and limits scalability. These limitations have motivated the transition toward energy-based electrochemical signal pathways, such as the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), oxygen reduction reaction (ORR), and water-splitting reactions. These reactions provide intrinsic electrochemical outputs that eliminate the need for synthetic redox mediators and can operate as built-in catalytic signal sources. Their integration into biosensing platforms simplifies assay design, enhances robustness, and broadens compatibility with diverse target molecules. This review outlines the mechanistic basis connecting HER/ORR/water-splitting reactions to signal generation in biosensors and highlights material design principles that enable their use as reagentless and label-free transduction strategies. Compared with traditional electroactive labels, energy-driven approaches offer simplicity, reduced cost, faster operation, and improved suitability for commercial translation. By establishing a unified framework for energy-based electro-recording mechanisms, this review aims to promote the development of next-generation bioanalytical methods that operate without electroactive labels and expand the applicability of electrochemical biosensing across various domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.