ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Landmine Press Kinematics Measured with an Enhanced YOLOv8 Model and Mathematical Modeling.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The landmine press is a reliable and valid test for assessing upper-body push strength. However, its application is constrained by the limitations of current mainstream monitoring technologies, such as linear position transducers (LPTs). These devices require physical attachment to the barbell, they rely on proprietary software, and their measurement accuracy can degrade under high-load conditions due to sensor drift and electromechanical noise. To address these limitations, this study developed a markerless, non-contact, and vision-based system using an enhanced YOLOv8-OBB model and a mathematical modeling framework to measure four kinematic indicators during the concentric phase of the landmine press. By integrating a polarized self-attention mechanism, an improved C3k2 module, and an optimized SPPF structure, the system significantly enhanced detection accuracy and robustness for the small targets at both ends of the barbell, achieving an mAP@0.5 of 0.995 on the test set. A method comparison study was conducted against a widely used LPT device (GymAware) across four loads (20-35 kg) in 247 trials. The results showed strong correlations (r > 0.85) for peak velocity, mean velocity, peak power, and mean power. Although the vision-based method systematically overestimated velocity metrics, the bias was predictable. Notably, under the highest load (35 kg), where LPT limitations are pronounced, the vision system demonstrated comparative stability, suggesting its potential advantage in mitigating sensor-related errors. The findings demonstrate that this vision-based system offers a reliable and practical alternative for monitoring landmine press kinematics, suitable for both training and scientific research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.