Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41755095›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Comparing Simultaneous Scalp EEG Recordings from the OpenBCI Cyton and Brain Products BrainAmp.

Alessandro D'Amico, Virginia R de Sa

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alessandro D'AmicoDepartment of Cognitive Science, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4313-9283
Virginia R de SaDepartment of Cognitive Science, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0989-3576

Funding

NSF IIS 1817226NSF IIS CRCNS 2208362
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Portable, affordable electroencephalography (EEG) amplifiers could enable neuroscience-scale data collection. The open-source OpenBCI Cyton shows promise in this regard, but remains undervalidated for cognitive neuroscience ERP experiments. We simultaneously recorded eight scalp electrodes with both Cyton and gold-standard Brain Products BrainAmp amplifiers across P3b-, ERN-, and N400-eliciting tasks. Five healthy volunteers completed visual oddball (P3b), flankers (ERN), and word association (N400) tasks. We quantified within-subject signal similarity using Pearson r2, mean absolute error (MAE), mean arctangent absolute percentage error (MAAPE), and within-component window mean and standard deviation. Cyton signals showed r2 = 97-100%, MAE ≈ 1 µV, and MAAPE ≈ 20% with BrainAmp signals at ERP sites of interest. No significant differences emerged in mean amplitudes within ERP component windows across amplifiers, though standard deviations differed significantly. These results demonstrate that the Cyton records highly similar but not identical scalp EEG as research-grade equipment. This first multi-subject, concurrent scalp EEG validation across multiple ERP components validates the Cyton for cognitive neuroscience and supports broader adoption of affordable open-source tools.

Indexed as

BrainElectroencephalographyScalpAdultElectrodesEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultBrainAmpbrain productscytonEEGERNERPlow-cost neuroimagingN400OpenBCIopen-sourceP300P3b

Identifiers

PMID41755095
PMCPMC12944456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.