ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
MMDet-Edge: A Multi-Scale and Multi-Object Detection Framework for Safety-Critical Edge Deployment.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An adaptive visual diagnostic model for complex scenes based on unsupervised pseudo-label continuous learning and BiFPN-enhanced YOLO.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Construction site safety remains a critical global challenge, demanding urgent attention. Existing surveillance systems struggle to balance multi-object detection accuracy, real-time efficiency, and environmental robustness under strict edge constraints. This paper presents MMDet-Edge, an edge-optimized unified detection framework that addresses these competing demands via three synergistic innovations. First, an adaptive feature fusion architecture with a learnable spatial-channel attention mechanism resolves cross-scale conflicts, boosting small-object average precision (AP) by 9.3%. Second, a hardware-conscious neural architecture search (HC-NAS) strategy co-optimizes sparsity patterns and quantization sensitivity, achieving a state-of-the-art performance of 89.4% mAP@0.5 at only 1.8 W power consumption-surpassing contemporary edge detectors by 6.3% mAP under equivalent power budgets. Third, by incorporating OSHA fatality statistics into a novel risk-weighted evaluation paradigm, we reduce high-consequence false negatives by 34%. Comprehensive evaluations on a purpose-built benchmark and cross-dataset tests demonstrate MMDet-Edge's superiority. It outperforms a wide range of state-of-the-art models. Validated across three active construction sites, the system enables real-time detection of five safety-critical targets (personnel, helmets, flames, smoke, vests) under extreme conditions, including >60% occlusion and >100 lux illumination variance. Our field deployments demonstrated a 22% reduction in safety incidents compared to conventional systems, establishing a new architectural paradigm for safety-critical edge AI through principled hardware-algorithm co-design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.