ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Detection of Abiotic Stress in Plants: A Review.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Global agriculture is facing significant threat from climate-driven abiotic stress, which endangers global food security by impacting crop performance and adaptation. However, traditional abiotic stress detection methods are often labor-intensive and lack precision and scalability. Efficient and reliable solutions are needed to meet rising global food demand. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) offer highly accurate, non-invasive, and sustainable approaches for abiotic stress detection. This paper reviews the impact of AI, and specifically Machine and Deep Learning algorithms, coupled with synergistic technologies and diverse datasets (imaging techniques and Internet of Things (IoT) infrastructures), to identify unique signatures of abiotic stress, and assess its impact on growth and physiological performance. It contrasts with other reviews that address individual technologies and algorithms, while presenting abiotic stress detection as a secondary objective. We examined peer-reviewed journal articles on the use of AI in detecting abiotic stress. The reviewed literature was chosen based on the stress category, sensing mode, and AI technologies employed. A comparative analysis was performed to explore potential advancements of AI-based abiotic stress detection methods over traditional approaches and also challenges lied to the adoption of AI in agriculture for abiotic stress detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.