Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41755058›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

A Review of Federated Large Language Models for Industry 4.0.

Feng Jing, Yujing Zhang, Mei Gao, Xiongtao Zhang, Huaizhe Zhou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Feng JingTest Center, National University of Defense Technology, Xi'an 710106, China.
Yujing ZhangTest Center, National University of Defense Technology, Xi'an 710106, China.
Mei GaoTest Center, National University of Defense Technology, Xi'an 710106, China.
Xiongtao ZhangTest Center, National University of Defense Technology, Xi'an 710106, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8399-5175
Huaizhe ZhouTest Center, National University of Defense Technology, Xi'an 710106, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9822-0527

Funding

Scientific Research Project of National University of Defense Technology 25-ZZ0X-KXKY-11Scientific Research Project of National University of Defense Technology ZK22-25Scientific Research Project of National University of Defense Technology ZK25-105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Industry 4.0 envisions a highly interconnected, autonomous manufacturing ecosystem enabled by the Industrial Internet of Things, Cyber-Physical Systems, and Artificial Intelligence. The emergence of large language models introduces new capabilities for semantic-aware decision-making, cross-domain knowledge integration, and intelligent automation. However, privacy, security, and regulatory constraints often isolate industrial data, impeding the scalability of LLMs in manufacturing. Federated learning addresses this by enabling decentralized LLM optimization without exposing raw data. This paper presents a comprehensive review of recent federated large language model research with a focus on industrial feasibility, comparing enabling techniques, system designs, and deployment strategies. Based on existing studies, forward-looking analyses are provided to highlight potential challenges and trade-offs in practical adoption, including computation and communication overheads, synchronization in large-scale federations, and system robustness. By bridging foundational methods with emerging industrial scenarios, we finally discuss the significant challenges associated with deploying federated large language models in complex industrial environments and outline a future research agenda.

Indexed as

federated learningindustry 4.0large language model

Identifiers

PMID41755058
PMCPMC12944690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.