SynthesisSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
The Micro-Mobility Sensing Gap: A Systematic Review of Physiological Safety Monitoring from Cycling to E-Scooters.
Synthesis in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Data-Minimizing Motion-Gated Artificial Intelligence Decision Support for Electric Micro-Mobility: An Architecture-Feasibility Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The transition from cycling to electric micro-mobility, such as e-scooters, introduces distinct safety risks. While physiological sensing is established for monitoring cyclist exertion, its transferability to high-vibration e-scooter environments remains unclear. This study systematically reviews wearable sensors used to detect stress, fatigue, and exertion in cycling and micro-mobility to identify gaps preventing active safety systems. A PRISMA-guided search of IEEE Xplore, Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and ScienceDirect was performed on 2 October 2025 for studies published in 2015-2025. From 273 records, 11 publications representing nine unique studies met the inclusion criteria. Laboratory studies (n=4) utilizing deep learning (CNN-LSTM) achieved high exertion prediction accuracy (F1 86.3-91.7%) but relied on a single redundant dataset (N=27), lacking independent validation. Field studies (n=7) relied on statistical associations between heart rate variability and environmental stress but lacked real-time predictive capabilities. Notably, evidence for automated physiological safety classification in e-scooters is critically underdeveloped. Current models are overfitted to cycling biomechanics and fail to account for e-scooter constraints, such as whole-body vibration. Future research must shift toward Unsupervised Domain Adaptation (UDA) and noise-resilient edge AI architectures to bridge the technological lag in micro-mobility safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.