ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Rethinking Nature's Pharmacy: AI Era and Natural Product Drug Discovery.
Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Natural Products in Cancer Research: Mechanistic Advances, Translational Challenges, and the Emerging Role of Chilean Biodiversity.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The Evolution of Phytochemical and Medicinal Plant Research in Chile: Status, Opportunities, and Challenges.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Ensemble learning-guided discovery of anti-tuberculosis phytochemicals: computational prediction and mechanistic insights.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Across the Drug Development Lifecycle.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Targeting pancreatic cancer with natural compounds: molecular mechanisms, preclinical evidence, clinical perspectives, and limitations.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Natural products (NPs) have long been a cornerstone of pharmaceutical innovation, contributing to approximately 50% of FDA-approved drugs over the past four decades. However, traditional NP drug discovery faces significant hurdles, including laborious isolation processes, biodiversity constraints, and low hit rates in high-throughput screening. These hurdles often extend the development timelines to 10-15 years with costs exceeding $2 billion per drug. Artificial intelligence (AI) emerges as a transformative force, leveraging machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), and generative models (Gen. AI) to expedite these processes. AI facilitates virtual screening of vast chemical libraries, predicts molecular interactions with unprecedented accuracy, and designs novel NP-inspired scaffolds, potentially reducing discovery time by up to 70%. This interdisciplinary approach not only addresses unmet medical needs but also aligns with global sustainability goals, potentially increasing success rates from <1% in traditional pipelines to over 10%. Ultimately, AI hints at revitalizing NP drug discovery, fostering innovative, eco-friendly therapeutics. This study reviews recent advancements in AI applications for NP drug discovery, including the challenges such as NPs representing only ~5% of screened compounds in many datasets, interpretability issues in "black-box" models, and ethical concerns over bioprospecting in biodiverse regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.