ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Silver Nanoparticles as Anticancer Agents: Mechanisms Insight, Current Studies, and Limitations.
Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chitosan in Modern Pharmacotherapy: Chitosan Nanoparticles and Delivery Systems.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Systems-Level Multi-Omics Analysis Resolves the Mechanism of Action of a Novel Multifunctional Nanosystem Against Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Bioengineered Silver Nanoparticles: Next-Generation Biogenic Synthesis Strategies for Precision Biomedical Applications.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Synthesis, characterization, antioxidant and anticancer potential of Kalanchoe pinnata green synthesized silver nanoparticles targeting p53/MDM2 nexus in hepatic cancer: integrated in vitro and in silico study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- cRGD-Targeted Nanoparticles Co-Loaded with Ag, Quercetin and PD-L1 siRNA with Combined Antibacterial and Immunotherapeutic Functions AgainstInternational journal of nanomedicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) have been studied extensively in recent years due to their biological activities. In addition to their well-known antibacterial, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory properties, AgNPs also exhibit anticancer properties. Increasing evidence from in vivo and in vitro studies demonstrates that AgNPs exert significant anticancer effects through multiple mechanisms, including oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, DNA damage, cell cycle arrest, and apoptosis. In addition to these mechanisms, inhibition of certain pathways is also an important mechanism that enables AgNPs to exhibit anticancer activity. Furthermore, green-synthesized AgNPs often exhibit enhanced biocompatibility and improved selective cytotoxicity against cancer cells. Despite these promising findings, concerns regarding AgNP-associated toxicity, non-specific cellular damage, and long-term safety remain major challenges limiting their clinical translation. Strategies such as size and shape optimization, surface functionalization, and combination therapies have been recommended to enhance anticancer efficacy while minimizing adverse effects on healthy cells. This review brings together recent studies, offers a broad perspective, and aims to present an objective viewpoint to fully explain the anticancer potential and current challenges of AgNPs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.