ArticlePolymers2026
Machine Learning-Enabled Optimization and Prediction of Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed PLA Composites Filled with Rice Husk Biochar.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This investigation focuses on rice husk biochar (RHBC) as a sustainable filler in a polylactic acid (PLA) matrix. This study employs optimization techniques, including central composite design (CCD) and analysis of variance (ANOVA), to systematically evaluate the effects of key 3D printing parameters such as filler content (0 wt.%, 10 wt.%, 20 wt.%), nozzle temperature (190 °C, 200 °C, 210 °C), orientation angle (0°, 60°, 120°), and fill pattern (hexagon, triangle, and 3D infill). Furthermore, machine learning models are used to predict the mechanical properties of PLA/RHBC composites from experimental data. The effects of these parameters on tensile strength, Young's modulus, and hardness were analyzed. The ANOVA results showed that filler content was the most influential factor for tensile strength and Young's modulus, contributing 36.47% and 73.25%, respectively, compared to pure PLA. For hardness, both filler content and nozzle temperature were key contributors, with a 44.08% improvement over pure PLA. Machine learning models, including multiple linear regression (MLR), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Gradient Boosting, were used to predict the mechanical properties. Among these, Gradient Boosting achieved the best performance, with R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.