Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41754694›Full record

ReviewPolymers2026

Can Microplastics (MPs) Replace Conventional Mineral Aggregates? A Brief Review.

Min Ook Kim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Min Ook KimDepartment of Civil Engineering, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, 232 Gongneung-ro, Nowon-gu, Seoul 01811, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9506-1505

Funding

Seoul National University of Science and Technology 2025-0638
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microplastics (MPs) are an increasingly pervasive pollutant, prompting interest in using them as a waste valorization feedstock in cementitious composites-most commonly as partial replacements for mineral aggregates. This review critically assesses the technical feasibility and implications of this approach based on current experimental and analytical evidence. Across the literature, MPs differ fundamentally from natural aggregates in stiffness, density, and surface chemistry, which weakens particle packing and interfacial bonding. Consequently, MP-aggregate substitution typically reduces workability and compressive strength and degrades durability-related performance, including resistance to chloride ingress, carbonation, and freeze-thaw action, with adverse effects generally increasing at higher replacement levels. While isolated benefits such as reduced unit weight and occasional post-cracking responses have been reported under specific mix designs, untreated MPs usually behave as mechanically inactive inclusions and stress concentrators rather than effective reinforcement. Major uncertainties remain regarding long-term durability and the risk of secondary MP release. Overall, MP-based aggregate replacement should be considered a conditional, application-specific strategy, currently most defensible for non-structural or function-driven applications under carefully defined performance and environmental criteria.

Indexed as

aggregate substitutioncementitious compositesdurabilityinterfacial bondingmechanical performancemicroplastics

Identifiers

PMID41754694
PMCPMC12944045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.