ReviewPolymers2026
Machine Learning for Predicting Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed Polymers from Process Parameters: A Review.
Review in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Functional Materials for Additive Manufacturing: Materials Design, Processing, and Emerging Applications.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polymer additive manufacturing (AM) has grown rapidly in the past decade, with material extrusion, vat photopolymerization, powder bed fusion and jetting now widely used for functional polymer parts. The mechanical performance of these parts depends strongly on process parameters such as layer height, build orientation, energy input and post-processing conditions, which motivate the development of predictive models for process-property relationships. Classical approaches based on Taguchi designs, ANOVA and response surface methodology have provided valuable insight, but the potential of modern machine learning (ML) techniques is not yet fully exploited. This review surveys recent work on ML-based prediction of mechanical properties of polymer AM parts using process parameters as inputs. Across the literature, well-tuned artificial neural networks, tree-based ensembles and support vector regression typically achieve prediction errors below about 5-10% for strength and modulus, showing that data-driven surrogates can substantially reduce experimental trial-and-error in process optimization. Ongoing challenges include small datasets, missing standardized error metrics, and limited coverage of non-quasi-static phenomena like fatigue, impact, and environmental degradation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.