Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41754678›Full record

ReviewPolymers2026

Hydrophobicity Strategies of Starch-Based Films: Recent Advances and Perspectives.

Elsa F Vieira, Tomás Amaral, Valentina F Domingues, Cristina Delerue-Matos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elsa F VieiraREQUIMTE/LAQV, Instituto Superior de Engenharia do Porto, Instituto Politécnico do Porto Rua Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida 431, 4249-015 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-0301-6182
Tomás AmaralREQUIMTE/LAQV, Instituto Superior de Engenharia do Porto, Instituto Politécnico do Porto Rua Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida 431, 4249-015 Porto, Portugal.
Valentina F DominguesREQUIMTE/LAQV, Instituto Superior de Engenharia do Porto, Instituto Politécnico do Porto Rua Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida 431, 4249-015 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-3472-849X
Cristina Delerue-MatosREQUIMTE/LAQV, Instituto Superior de Engenharia do Porto, Instituto Politécnico do Porto Rua Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida 431, 4249-015 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-3924-776X

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia Reference- PD21-00024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid accumulation of plastic waste and the depletion of fossil resources have intensified global efforts to develop biodegradable polymeric materials derived from renewable feedstocks. In this context, starch-based films have emerged as one of the most promising alternatives to conventional petroleum-based plastics, owing to their wide availability, low cost, biodegradability, and ability to form continuous films using simple and scalable processing techniques. Starch is a naturally occurring polysaccharide composed primarily of amylose and amylopectin, whose molecular structure is rich in hydroxyl (-OH) groups. These functional groups promote extensive intermolecular hydrogen bonding, enabling starch gelatinization and film formation in aqueous systems. However, the same hydroxyl-rich structure confers a pronounced hydrophilic character, resulting in high moisture sensitivity, poor water vapor barrier properties, and limited dimensional stability under humid. Consequently, improving the hydrophobicity of starch-based films remains one of the most critical challenges for their practical application in food packaging. This review aims to summarize and critically discuss the main strategies reported for improving the hydrophobicity of starch-based films. The review focuses on composition and processing approaches, including (i) chemical modification of starch, (ii) incorporation of hydrophobic additives, (iii) reinforcement with natural fibers and nanocellulosic materials, (iv) polymer blending and multilayer/gradient architectures, and (v) processing strategies, including film homogenization, shear treatment and aging conditions. Emphasis is placed on the mechanisms governing hydrophobicity enhancement, comparative performance indicators, and current limitations.

Indexed as

chemical modification of starchhydrophobic additiveshydrophobicitynanofillers reinforcementstarch-based filmsthermoplastic starchwater contact anglewater vapor permeability

Identifiers

PMID41754678
PMCPMC12943859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.